Since we accept your order and can enter into a legally binding agreement without further reference to you, you should read these Terms and Conditions to ensure that they contain everything you want and nothing you are not satisfied with. 1. These Terms and Conditions apply to the purchase of the goods by you (the customer or you). We are Kinara International Ltd, whose trade name is www.ubereatskit.co.uk, a company registered in England and Wales under number 11204753 Churchill House, 137-139 Brent Street, Hendon, London, United Kingdom, NW4 4DJ. with e-mail address firstname.lastname@example.org; (the supplier or us or us). 26. We deliver the goods to the place of delivery before the agreed date or within the agreed period or, if no agreement has been concluded, immediately and, in any event, no more than thirty days after the date of conclusion of the contract. 4. Contract means the legally binding agreement between you and us regarding the delivery of the goods; 52. You can also complete and send the model withdrawal form or any other clear statement of the customer`s decision to terminate the contract on our website, www.ubereatskit.co.uk. If you use this option, we will immediately provide you with an acknowledgement of receipt of such cancellation on a durable medium (e.g.
B by e-mail). In short, none. The inclusion of unfair contract terms in an agreement does not entail a penalty under the law. Indeed, Section 23 ACL simply allows the ACCC to challenge and set aside the injuring time limit in court. In short, this means that the ACCC cannot receive civil fines if a contract term is found to be unfair. Uber`s terms described above from 1 to 4 contain all elements of unfair contract terms. For example, consider the terms two and three; Here, Uber has essentially put on the restaurant all the risks related to the delivery standard. Despite the fact that these companies have no control over the delivery time, the payment of delivery drivers or their workload. This is a classic example of how a “take it or leave it” contract created a significant imbalance in the relationship between Uber and the restaurant. Uber would take little or no risk under the contract and restaurateurs would be responsible for service issues beyond their control under the deal. .